Different casino games make a different amount of contribution to wagering requirements- some none at all. A look at the reasons for these disparities.
A good bonus is a great attraction to an online gambling site. However, the fun ends almost immediately. After betting and realizing that you cannot withdraw your winnings immediately, you begin to realize that there was actually a devil in the details.
Welcome to the wagering requirement. The attached condition requires you to keep betting using your own money until you can unlock your bonus winnings. However, it is is often annoying to notice that some games contribute so little towards achieving the target- some as little as 25%. some games do not even make any contribution at all.
Many slots games make absolutely no contribution towards fulfilling your wagering requirement. Even after playing them for hours, you will find that your wagering requirement has not improved one bit. But why is this the case? It all boils down to the gaming house attempting to recoup its money.
Generally, slots games have a high Return To Player (RTP) rate. It goes as high as 98%. This means that a gambler can play for long durations and still remain even- no loss or win. In this instance, the player would be contributing to their wagering requirement while not actually giving any money to the house.
Then there is the case of progressive jackpots. These games are absolutely attractive to players but not essentially profitable to the house. Around 5% of the money wagered on these games goes back out as progressive payouts. Sometimes, this amount goes as high as 10% of players' stake.
As such, houses do not have the luxury of including these games in the wagering requirements. Doing so would be setting themselves up to get milked dry. To avert this, they encourage people to play other games by not including them in the wagering requirement fulfillment or assigning them a very low percentile.
The game of roulette is particularly discriminatory in terms of making the wagering requirement. But the decision makes economic sense. By betting on one color, for example, a player has a 47% chance of moving forward. Betting on two colors doubles this chance, hence the game can be easily used purely for wagering requirement fulfillment.
The decision by gaming houses to reduce the contribution of certain games to the wagering requirement and leaving others out entirely is not personal. It is just a financially sensible decision that gives them a chance of making money as the wagering requirement is met. It is important to look at a game's contribution before playing.
Understanding the wagering requirement game contribution Different casino games make a different amount of contribution to wagering requirements- some none at all. A look at the reasons for these disparities.